6.1.2
Institution practices decentralization and participative management
Democratic and Participatory Governance at Mahabodhi Mahavidyalaya
Mahabodhi Mahavidyalaya embraces a democratic and participatory mode of governance, ensuring that. all stakeholders—management, faculty, staff, and students—actively engage in the institution’s administration. The college operates in a structured manner that fosters participative management at all levels of decision-making. Every stakeholder, from the Chairman of the Management Committee to students, plays a vital role in the development and progress of the college.
The Principal and two faculty members are integral parts of the managing committee, which promotes effective measures to encourage staff involvement in enhancing the college’s effectiveness and efficiency throughout the year. The college features a Student Representative body known as the “Student Council,” which embodies the principles of student leadership. The Class Representative (CR) system allows one representative from each class to voice student interests, with regular meetings ensuring the system’s efficiency in addressing student concerns.
Student Council Composition and Election Process
The Student Council comprises the following members:
- President
- Vice President
- Secretary
- Joint Secretary
- Class Representatives
A transparent election process is followed, starting with students filling out nomination forms for various positions. The election involves voting, with results counted transparently in the presence of senior teachers and students. Elected members are announced during a college assembly.
Decentralization and Participatory Management
The Mahabodhi Shaikshanik evm Samajik Seva Sansthan is committed to modern management concepts such as decentralization, teamwork, and participative decision-making. This commitment is reflected in the organizational climate fostered by the Principal and the Conveners of various committees, which encourages participatory democracy.
Faculty members play a crucial role in planning and executing college administrative processes. Responsibilities are delegated based on individual competence and commitment, which not only balances workloads but also offers development opportunities, thereby creating a positive and motivating environment. This approach cultivates team spirit and encourages innovative teaching and learning experiences.
Committee Structure and Decision-Making
Various committees, including the Administrative Committee, Academic Committee, Examination Committee, Anti-Ragging Committee, and College Campus Beautification Committee, exemplify the culture of participative management. These committees meet regularly to consider the opinions of all members and pass resolutions based on majority consent.
The governing body includes two staff representatives who contribute to overall policy and governance, along with an active teachers’ union. The Institutional Quality Assurance Cell (IQAC) and the Campus Beautification Committee further illustrate the commitment to decentralization and participative management. While the Principal has the final authority in committee decisions, a senior assistant professor serves as the convener, leading discussions and initiatives.
Transparent Working Procedures
The college follows a transparent process for addressing demands and requisites. Initially, these requests are submitted to the office and reviewed by the Principal, who then assigns them to the appropriate committee. The convener notifies members of the meeting date and time to discuss the requests. After deliberation, members sign a comparative statement before placing orders. Once the order is fulfilled, a cheque is issued to the supplier. Committee meetings are held as needed, with minutes meticulously recorded to ensure accountability and transparency.
Mahabodhi Mahavidyalaya’s commitment to democratic and participatory governance fosters a collaborative environment where all stakeholders can contribute to the college’s continuous improvement and success.